10 June 2007

The Loss of Corpus Christi.......

Many may have noticed that Thursday came and went, and there was not a word from me about Corpus Christi. Originally I was going to put up a picture because I was too tired to write this post. But then I thought it would have a greater effect to say nothing about it, for reasons which will be abundantly clear in a minute.

For 750 years, true Christians came together to celebrate the solemn feast of our Lord's sacred Body in the Eucharist, and followed the Sacrifice of Mass up with a procession. All business stopped on the Thursday after the feast of the Trinity, and all took part in the holy procession. This event was prevalent and powerful up until the modern era. The streets were filled with people chanting the praises of God in every city of the west until our time. Then this began to taper off.

Vatican II never addressed this of course. Yet, the event of Vatican II opened the door for every liberal with an axe to grind against the Churches traditional practice and devotion. The same "experts" at Vatican II who helped framed the debates also re-interpreted the council to the world. One of the first things that was done was a discouragement of Eucharistic adoration, namely through the hatred of the 40 hours devotion. Instantly liturgists began demanding an end to Eucharistic adoration, because it was a "medieval add on". Of course it was recorded in Spain in the 6th century, but as we saw with the discarding of the Traditional Mass, 1400 years is not old enough for liturgists, unless it supports what they want. So in many cities, Bishops announced there would no longer be Eucharistic processions on Corpus Christi. Then, as soon as they were able, the Bishops learned they could move feasts to the Sunday, especially Holy Days of obligation, under the guise that they could help people participate more in them, rather than making people come to Mass during their busy weekday schedule of tv, tv, tv, and more tv, or atheistic capitalist greed which leads a man to ignore his family for the idol of money. In fact, the USCCB couldn't dare ask people to come to Mass a second time, so they have made Holy Days of Obligation "optional" when they come on Monday, so as not to make people come to Church two days in a row. Oh, how horrible! One might have missed both Sunday cartoons and heathen sitcoms on Monday night! Now I do realize that before Vatican II, on certain occasions in certain places Corpus Christi could be moved to Sunday. However that was a toleration in a minority of circumstances in certain places. Today, find me more than a handful of Churches that have Corpus Christi on Thursday rather than on Sunday!

In any event, that takes us too far from the point. Moving feasts from the weekday to the Sunday has worked well in favor of breaking down traditional devotion. When our Blessed Lord revealed Himself to Blessed Juliana of Mt. Cornillon and asked for the establishment of Corpus Christi, he asked that it be set on a Thursday. Not that it could be moved to Sunday if everyone is too busy. In fact, the gospel for the Sunday after Corpus Christi (today), has for today's Gospel this parable:
Et misit servum suum hora coenae dicere invitatis ut venirent, quia jam parata sunt omnia. Et coeperunt simul omnes excusare. Primus dixit ei, Villam emi, et necesse habeo exire et videre illam: rogo te, habe me excusatum. Et alter dixit: Juga bonum emi quinque et eo probare illa: rogo te, habe me excusatum. Et alius dixit: Uxorem duxi, et ideo non possum venire. Et reversus servus nuntiavit haec domino suo. Tunc iratus paterfamilias, dixit servo suo: Exi cito in plateas et vicos civitatis: et pauperes ac debiles et caecos et claudos introduc huc.

And he sent his servant at the hour of the supper to give the invitation that they might come, for now all things had been prepared. And all took up to make the same excuse. The first said to him "I have bought a villa [farm], and it must needs be that I have to go out and see it, I ask you, have my excuse. And another said "I have bought a good yoke of five [five oxen] and I go to test them, I ask you to have my excuse. And yet another said "I have married, and therefore I am not able to come. And the servant, returning declared this to his lord. Thus the master was angry, and he said to his servant: Go out through the lanes, streets and ways of the city: and bring here the blind, the infirm, the poor, and the lame. (Luke XIV, my translation, from Today's gospel).
Obviously the immediate application is to the pharisees and those specific Jews who rejected the Gospel. However, isn't it interesting, that the people of today are too busy to entertain the possibility of going to see our Blessed Lord on a weekday? As if Mass attendance wasn't so bad for Sundays, it is far worse for holy days. I find it mildly amusing and very interesting that this Gospel is on the Sunday when so many Bishops in the Novus Ordo are moving Corpus Christi to Sunday, because the people won't take part for the same kind of excuses offered to the Paterfamilias in our Lord's parable.

Now consider, what if in the face of increased secularization, an increasingly decreased presence of the Church in the world, if the Bishops had resiliently continued to assemble a Eucharistic procession, not just around the Church block, but down mainstreet, amidst its hustle and bustle, amidst the hubris of the world, to carry the king of the world, chanting the most excellent chants of the Pange Lingua, the O Salutaris, the Tantum Ergo, and any of the great Eucharistic hymns and chants which are today heard more on cd players than in churches? Imagine what a difference it could have made! Now in some places of the world there are again processions, and in other places like in Rome there have always been processions, but in Rome it is natural. In France and America, or England, they are no longer natural, they are quite exceptional, and if done at all, it is a short procession down the street from the Church so that no one will be disturbed. A hundred years ago the Catholic faithful gladly marched down any street to proclaim the glory of Christ's kingship. St. Elizabeth Ann Seton was converted from protestantism, when in Italy a Eucharistic procession went past her window. One wonders how many more Elizabeth Ann Setons are waiting for our Lord to pass, who might be sparked into action by his presence? Who knows what kind of witness it might give to the world, of the faith of the Church?

But now, we can't be bothered during the week, and we need to run to the mall after Mass on Sunday so of course we can't have a procession! If we do have a procession it must be out of the way so as not to cause embarrassment or offend people.

Traditional Catholics are not exempted from this criticism of the state of affairs in the Church. There are plenty of parishes with large numbers at their Traditional Latin Mass, regardless of whether or not it is indult, one of the Latin Mass Orders, or SSPX or independent, why aren't they organizing processions? You mean people can't make sure to get the day off a few months in advance? Most employers give days off with sufficient notice. The priest can't do a procession? Some do by the way. Most do not. In fact an overwhelming majority do not, and it is sad. The feasts and traditions of the past helped uphold and strengthen the faith of the layman, and give a cultus which roots the family firmly in the true faith, making the reality of the Church ever more present in our society. It is a tragedy that we have not brought this back. It is the exposure to the Traditional Liturgy that increases our numbers, and the more we can do such as a procession like that of Corpus Christi, the more exposure to the Church the secular and agnostic society we live in will be exposed to. The restoration of Christendom will not happen in a vacuum, but with the devoted witness of Catholics everywhere. There is no more Christendom, it is dead. We have reverted to a period like the Roman Empire, where the members of the true faith (the true members not the lukewarm pretenders or the apostates) are like seeds in the earth, germinating without the notice of the proximate society. Only tradition can preach the gospel to the modern world, only tradition can bring union with the Eastern Churches, and only tradition can strengthen us against the assault of the modern world.

9 comments:

Aaron Traas said...

I don't know exactly what you mean about Vatican II making war on adoration; maybe it's different where you live. Where I live, in Jersey, there are 5 perpetual adoration chapels within 8 miles. Two of them are always packed to the gills.

Lily said...

Aaron, you are very blessed! There is no where around here that offers perpetual adoration. When I've tried to get it started I've heard things like, "Nobody does that anymore" or "We could never staff it" or "the people just don't want it" etc. I'm afraid on this one Athanasius is correct. You are amongst the fortunate minority.

Welcome back, Athanasius, from your little break. I hope you weren't ill, just tired. We look forward to many more great posts from you!

Eugenio said...

Aaron, that is a rarity these days. Thank God you have that so close.

Pauly said...

I had never even known what perpetual adoration was until I was 27, and I was considered a very "devout" Catholic by all who knew me (just go to mass more than once a week, go to confession once a month, and attend some extra stuff, and whamo, everyone thinks you're a saint *eyes rolling*). When I asked our priest if we could get something like that together for our parish, he pointed out how small the room was that the tabernacle had been moved to. It only fits about 4 people, and that would be crowded. I pointed out that he could put the Holy Eucharist in the monstrance and maybe even have a night where he did Benediction, and he not only looked at me as if I were crazy, but his response was "with the shortage of priests these days, you people are lucky that I'm able to say mass for you every other day of the week, let alone even have time to hear your confessions for an hour on Saturday. Where do you think I would get the time to set up such a day?"

The very next evening, I was playing golf with two friends of mine, and guess who I bumped into, wearing a polo shirt and dorky looking golf shorts? My parish priest. Too busy to set aside even one night a month for Benediction and Eucharistic Adoration.

I live in Southern California, and I know that this is the rule, not the exception. There are very few adoration chapels, and they are not perpetually open either. People don't even know what perpetual adoration is!

The place I go to for mass now is a mission, the priest travels, so he can't set up something like that unless we have a church of our own, but at least everyone at this mission knows the importance of this beautiful, grace filled devotion.

Anonymous said...

I am amongst fortunate minority.In my city Corpus Christi Procession gathered about 150 thausends faithfull.Main part-from Cross to Most Holy Sacrament-1 mile.The rest-2 miles or more.In another city Procession go 18 miles with over million faithfull,road is made with flovers,and all homes are like altars,every description is useless,you have must See it. Where? In Poland.Bless God American Traditionalists

Terry Nelson said...

Aaron,
What I assume Athanasius means is that before the pontificate of JPII, Eucharistic adoration (the Blessed Sacrament exposed) outside of Mass was discouraged, as was the practice of Benedicttion of the Blessed Sacrament. Shrine Churches continued the practice, but the average parish did not, especially in renovated Churches where the tabernacle was either removed to another room or off to the side.

It is only since JPII that adoration chapels sprang up around the country. Indeed, Eucharistic processions have only made a come back in the last 10-15 years or so. In the NO rite, the feast of Corpus Christi was distorted to consider The People of God as the Body of Christ, hence, the feast itself was downplayed. many homilists would say things like, "Jesus is present in the bread and wine, but we are his body - he is present in us when we gather around the table of the Lord." And other such...drivel.

If you are a younger person, you may not know this.

BTW - great post Athanasius!

crusader88 said...

Until I looked online yesterday, I had not even known that it was the feast of Corpus Christi [or that it was traditionally on Thursday], because our priest addressed it as "the feast of the Body and Blood of Christ" or something similar. Frankly, such cumbersome, ordinary-sounding names are likely at the root of the decline in devotion on such Holy Days. [I, for one, still have to catch up and learn about many of the Catholic Church's diverse Holy Days]

However, our town was also "very blessed". About 150 people participated in the Rosary Procession, which ended with a lengthy Eucharistic devotion and prayers. Prayers of consecration to the Sacred Heart were included. Sadly, our parish priest wasn't in it; although he went to the procession in Springfield, he had given an ignorant homily against Eucharistic adoration at Mass earlier, comparing those who want the tabernacle behind the altar to Jansenists by reference.

Athanasius said...

Terry is exactly correct, and perhaps I should have been more clear. This is one of the positive things which John Paul II brought, is that he made a definitive push for Eucharistic Adoration, and this brought a turn in the tide. Before JPII there was NO Eucharistic Adoration scarcely anywhere, except by Traditionally minded priests or the SSPX, regardless of whether or not it was the 40 hours devotion, or Perpetual.

After John Paul II it started to gain ground, but has been stopped in many places. It all depends upon the caliber of priests in an area, or the Bishop. For example, in Florida Bishop Lynch canned all Eucharistic Adoration in his diocese, because it "detracted from the understanding of Jesus in our brother and sister." That was in 2002. He officially banned perpetual adoration, and discourages holy hours.

In my area, there is only one Church which has adoration, which is almost perpetual. They are trying to discourage it by cutting the hours, even though they know all the slots are full. First they started closing the chapel down during Masses (even though it is in a separate building) under the false guise that it would interfere with the Mass, which is a canard. They used to have Mass with the Blessed Sacrament in the Old Rite, and did so for 800 years, but that doesn't count for much.

Now they are cutting midnight hours, even though those are the most crowded. The pastor scarcely knows anything about the Catholic faith, so it is no surprise. Between here and LA there is one Church that has adoration at all, and it is SSPX.

Athanasius said...

although he went to the procession in Springfield, he had given an ignorant homily against Eucharistic adoration at Mass earlier, comparing those who want the tabernacle behind the altar to Jansenists by reference.

Isn't that typical? Attacking those who care about Jesus by calling them by heresies he doesn't understand.

Let's see, some obviously Jansenistic saints:

St. Francis de Sales
St. Claire
St. Norbert
St. Thomas
St. Therese
St. Claude de la Collambiere
St. Pius X
St. Pio

That priest needs a lot of prayer!